Metallic coatings
can be used to boost the secondary electron emission of the specimen
as well as rendering it conductive. Aluminum, gold, platinum, chromium,
tungsten, tantalum, and palladium are common metal used to coat specimens.
The two most common methods of coating are thermal evaporation and sputter
coating. With thermal evaporation, there is the risk of radiant thermal
damage to the specimen. Also, the metallic particles may retain enough
heat to burn into the specimen. Sputter coating is generally the preferred
method of specimen coating. Sputter coating takes place in a vacuum
chamber. The specimen to be coated is loaded upon the anode. A vacuum
is generated. Prior to coating, the vacuum is compromised with an inert
gas (usually argon). When a high tension is applied to the cathode where
the metal source resides, the argon gas molecules are attracted to the
cathode. The ionized argon strikes the metallic target, knocking loose
metal grains, which are attracted to the anode. Due to the directional
randomness of the argon/target collisions, and omnidirectional coating
is achieved upon the specimen.
There is discussion
in the literature about coating versus decoration. Sputter coating of
gold and gold/palladium mixtures is referred to as decoration. When
a metal grain from such a source strikes the surface of a specimen creating
islands of coating. Metals such as chromium, tantalum, and tungsten
tend to stick where they land upon the surface of the specimen. Therefore,
they are coatings.
Grain size of the
metal produced is also important. Smaller grains provide better resolution.
This is because they obscure less specimen detail. Au and Au/Pd grain
sizes are about 2-2.5 nanometer. Cr and W can produce grain sizes on
the order of 1.5 nanometer. Thus, Cr and W coatings can generate
higher resolution images.
In the discussion
of signal generation, it was stated that the amount of backscattered
electrons increases with increasing atomic number. It was also stated
that the BSE signal lacks high-resolution information. From these two
statements, what can be predicted about gold vs. chromium coatings?
Chromium, having a lower atomic number than gold, generates fewer backscattered
electrons. This makes it a better coating for high-magnification use.
It takes a special field emission (in-the-lens) SEM to resolve the coating
grains. The average SEM cannot take advantage of the increased resolution
of the Cr coat.
Once prepared, the sample should be stored in a vacuum desiccator. This
prevents hydration to atmospheric humidity levels and reduces oxidation
of the metal coating. Most specimens can be stored indefinitely with
little appreciable degradation.