36G:323 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH METHODS

FALL SEMESTER, 1997

Class meetings: Tu Th 1:05-2:20 106-BCSB
Instructor of record:
Steve Duck, 105B-BCSB 335-0579
Office Hours:
M Tu Th 2:30-3:30 and by appointment

Basic Text

Student complaints concerning
faculty action

Course Assignments
Course Schedule

Plagiarism and cheating

This is one of two core courses for doctoral students primarily in Interpersonal and Small Croup Communication, the second being the course on Communication Theory in the Spring of 1998. The course normally introduces students to several of the methods commonly used in communication research and seeks to connect methods of data collection and analysis to methodological stance and to theoretical currents in the field. The particular goals of the class are (l) to make students more knowledgeable about particular methods yet (2) to see the research enterprise as a whole, rather than as composed of separate issues such as framing of research questions, and choices between possible methods of research. The course will also increase your familiarity with the different audiences reached by important journals in the field, and help you to consider the rhetorical implications of different audiences in choosing target outlets for your work. Finally the class will be focused on the design, conduct, and analysis of a research project of your own which will be presented to the class for development, report, and discussion. The intention is to provide you with some guided "hands on" experience that will become the basis for future conference presentations or publications.

The starting point for any research effort is to analyse the concepts that interest you. The analysis often is aided by becoming familiar with, and personally reflecting on, the previous contributions of other scholars so that you can visualize the topic and plan your approach in the knowledge of how it has previously been conceptualized -- even if you choose to do it a different way. Of course this sort of work connects you immediately to some "Big Questions" about the sort of activity in which you are engaged -- are you buying into a particular world view by focusing on certain sorts of questions, for example? The next stage is a careful and programmatic analysis of a means for achieving your goal of studying a topic. What means of handling the topic will be most productive? Such questions are rarely simply answered and one often has to trade off some things against others (for example, weighing convenience and cost against the approach to the issues that best reflects your style, or balancing the advantage of a one-shot study against the losses of information about real life contexts that influence the communication behaviors that you are intent on studying). A third element of the analysis, especially in a social scientific mode is ruling out alternative explanations for any findings that you uncover. Statistical procedures provide a standard way of ruling out the alternative explanation that your findings are pure chance, for example. But this aspect of the analytic issue is more subtle than just applying statistical techniques. It really cuts right to the roots of what we are attempting to do in studying communication: define, depict, analyse, and interpret what is going on.

The course will connect you to these issues by building on what you already know about methods, exposing you to some methods you do not yet know, and by giving you the chance to try out a particular method by working on a specific research problem. The endpoint of the course should be a paper that is at least suitable for convention presentation and may provide you with the basis for publishable work later on. You will actually gather data and will deal with some analytic issues associated with that.

Although I will be the instructor of record for this course, Professors Baxter, Fitch, and Hirokawa will also be involved in course instruction.

Basic Text:

Montgomery, B. M., & Duck, S. W. (Eds.). (1991). Studying Interpersonal Interaction. New York: Guilford.

This will be the central text for the first part of the course, and it contains a summary of many methods that you may wish to explore. Other faculty may issue supplementary reading lists for classes in which they will participate and some materials will be placed in the appropriate tray in the Main Office.


Course Assignments.

I will be responsible for assigning course grades and evaluating all assignments. I will, however, consult with other IPSG faculty as needed and you may be working with one or more faculty and students as your project unfolds.

Thirty percent of the course grade will be based on an "audience analysis" of a major journal in the field of communication studies.
You will review the kinds of articles published in that journal over the past 10-15 years (by looking at one issue per year, to get a sense of tendencies and trajectories over time), talk to people in the department who have published in that journal or served as reviewers or editors for it, and prepare a handout (NO MORE THAN TWO PAGES IN LENGTH! Go for concise synthesis, not lists of lengthy quotations) that outlines the primary audience for that journal and the kinds of topics and methods that have been popular over the years. Publication of research articles requires an understanding of where to aim your work, and our goal in this assignment is to gather and share detailed information about diverse outlets in the field among class members, in a form that you each can refer to later.
These analyses will serve as the basis for discussion of the rhetoric of presentation of research findings on October 21st. You should bring enough copies for everyone in the class, and be prepared to talk for 10-15 minutes about the journal you reviewed.
Seventy percent of the course grade will be based on required reports and the final 15-20 page double-spaced paper (consistent with APA style) that reports on a study you will conduct.
In the first part of the semester, you should be thinking about a topic area and doing a preliminary literature review. By Friday 26th Sept, you will turn in a rough draft of the literature review and propose 2-3 research questions or hypotheses. I will give you feedback on those, and you will then develop the remainder of the proposal, including rationale, a full explanation of methods, and thoughts about analysis and implications, for submission October 3rd. You should continue to work with a faculty member or other class members on this proposal.
The final version of the paper is due on Fri. 12th Dec. (I truly do expect to see all papers in my box on or before that day); but you will each report on your paper in the last two weeks of class also (i.e., Dec. 2nd through 11th).

If you are uncertain about any of this then please be sure to see me to clarify anything that is confusing about the purpose or procedures involved in each assignment. To clarify issues related to specific methods, you are best advised to consult the faculty member listed as being in charge of presenting it to the class.

COURSE SCHEDULE

Tues. Aug. 26th Intro. to conceptual issues and Research Ethics
Reading: M&D Chapters 1 (Duck & Montgomery) and 2 (Bochner et al)
Thurs. Aug. 28th Experimental design (SD)
Reading: M&D Chapter by Tardy & Hosman. We will discuss some issues of experimentation, design and interpretation.
Tues. Sept. 2nd Participant observation (KF)
Reading: Reading supplied by KF
Thurs. Sept. 4th The practice of research (SD)
Reading: Acitelli paper in JSPR 1997 (pp 243-261)
Tues. Sept. 9th Surveys and content analysis (LAB)
Reading: M&D chapter by Baxter (LAB will supply extra reading a week ahead)
Thurs. Sept. 11th Accounts (SD)
Reading M&D Chapter by Burnett
Tues. Sept. 16th meet with a faculty member for a preliminary discussion of a research proposal (Due for submission Sept. 26th and finalization by Oct. 3rd)
Thurs. Sept. 18th or otherwise as arranged Interpersonal Process Analysis (RYH)
Randy will fix up a class meeting on this topic; class will not meet otherwise.
Tues. Sept. 23rd and Thurs. 25th Charles Antaki from the UK will take the class and deal with Discourse Analysis
Reading: Papers supplied by CA and available from SD

Literature review and draft project outline due Fri. 26th
Tues. Sept. 30th Development of research proposals (SD, LAB, KF, RYH)
Class members will submit a first draft of their project and present their basic ideas for a research project to the class and we will discuss them.
Come prepared for a presentation of the outline and a discussion of its general conceptualization, theoretical derivation and so forth, report of literature search, etc.
Thurs. Oct. 2nd Dealing with data analysis (SD, LAB, KF, RYH)
Class members will get some hands on experience of dealing with data

Revised proposal due Fri. Oct. 3rd
Tues. Oct. 7th
and
Thurs. Oct. 9th
Revised development of research proposals and analysis (SD)

From here on in most of the classes will be devoted to progress reports, revisions of work on your project and experiences of data handling. Keep in mind that other faculty may be involved in these projects and that you may need to arrange meetings with them for that purpose.
Tues. Oct. 14th
and
Thurs. Oct. 16th
Plans for data collection (SD, KF, LAB, RYH)
The class will discuss the outlined plans for data collection and work through the refinement of these plans
Tues. Oct. 21st Rhetoric of research and journal publication (SD)
Reading: Bazerman article supplied by SD
Your analysis of a journal is due this week
Thurs. Oct. 23rd No class meeting - Do some data collection this week
Tues. Oct. 28th
and
Thurs. Oct. 30th
Data Collection: First report and discussion (SD)
We will check in on the progress of data collection and discuss any dilemmas or issues arising and do some exemplary hands on" work with data.
Tues. Nov. 4th
and Thurs.
Nov. 6th
Data Collection: Second report and discussion (SD)
We will check in again on the progress of data ollection and discuss any dilemmas or issues arising and do more hands on work.
Tues. Nov. 11th
and
Thurs. Nov. 13th
Preliminary discussion of analysis (SD)
We will begin to discuss the ways the analysis is looking and do more "hands on"
Tues.. Nov. 18th Analysis Reports (SD)
Thurs. Nov. 17th No class meeting (National Communication Association meeting)
Thurs. Nov. 20th No class meeting - NCA
Tues. Nov. 25th and No class meeting Thanksgiving
Tues.. Dec. 2nd and
Thurs. Dec. 4th
Meetings and progress reports
Tues. Dec. 9th and
Thurs. Dec. 11th
Meetings and progress reports
Final paper due: Friday Dec. 12th by 5.00 p.m.

Other professional matters

The University Classroom Manual now requires that all courses, including those taught by TAs, include the following guidance on student complaints and cheating and they are included here partly to inform you of your rights and duties on this course and also to provide discussion points for the class and guidance for your own classes in the future, both those you may run and those you may take.

Student complaints concerning faculty action

The University Operations Manual states that, at the beginning of each courses students should be informed of departmental and collegiate complaint procedures. A student who has a complaint against any member of the CollegeÆs teaching staff is responsible for following the procedures
described below. Complaints may concern inappropriate faculty conduct (including inappropriate course materials), incompetence in oral communication, inequities in assignments, scheduling of examinations at other than authorized and published times, failure to provide disability accommodations, or grading grievances. In complaints involving assignment of grades, it is college policy that grades cannot be changed without the permission of the department concerned.

  • The student should ordinarily try to resolve the matter with the instructor first;

  • If the complaint is not resolved to the studentÆs satisfaction, the student should discuss the matter further with the ..... DEO [Departmental Executive Officer], or in some departments the person designated to hear complaints. [On this course since I am both the coordinator and the DEO I will discuss complaints about other faculty in the normal way, but in the case of complaints about my own actions I will appoint a person from the Graduate Affairs Committee to review any unresolved complaints about this course that fall into this category]

  • If the matter remains unresolved, the student may submit a written complaint to the Graduate College (Associate Dean Jakobsen 335-2137). The Associate Dean will attempt to resolve the complaint and if necessary may convene a special committee to recommend appropriate action. He will respond to the student in writing concerning the disposition of the complaint.

  • If the complaint cannot be resolved through the mechanisms described above, the student may file a formal complaint, which will be handled under the procedures established for dealing with alleged violations of the statement on professional ethics and academic responsibility in the University Operations Manual. A description of these procedures may be obtained in the Office of Academic Programs, 120 Schaeffer Hall (335-2633). If complaints at the departmental or college level involving reasonable academic accommodations for students with disabilities cannot be resolved through the mechanisms described above, the student may consult the Ombuds Office or the Office of Affirmative Action.

Plagiarism and cheating

Plagiarism is, among other things, the unacknowledged use of the ideas of another person. Cheating is, among other things, copying from someone else's work [in undergraduate classes, using sorority or fraternity records of previous answers to essays in a class], or downloading work from an electronic database without citation. I also interpret this to mean the borrowing of substantial parts of essays that you or others have written for other courses or for which you have received or will receive credit, copying work from other students on the course, or representing as, your own work work actually done by others. An instructor who suspects a student of plagiarism or cheating must inform the student (preferably in writing) as soon as possible after the incident has been observed or discovered. Instructors who detect cheating or plagiarism may decide, in consultation with the Departmental Executive Officer [or member of the Graduate Affairs Committee as noted above], to reduce the student's grade for the assignment or in the course, even to assign an F. Fuller details of this policy are available from the Office of Academic Programs, in the Schedule of Courses, and in the Liberal Arts Bulletin.


Admission Information  |  Areas of Study  |  Course Descriptions  |  Faculty & Staff
Who to ask ...  |  Publications & Projects  |  What's New?  |  Links  |  HOME