Part 1-III Section Outline
Competing Theories of Economic Development
- What is Development Economics?
- The Structuralist School: State-Led Development Was Key
- Economic Development May Only Be Achieved Through an Internal Expansion of the Local Economy.
- Economic Development Meant Improving the Technological Levels of Lagging Sectors of the Economy.
- The Structure of Underdeveloped Economies Could be Explained by the Process Through Which Developing Economies Have Historically Been Incorporated Into the International Economy.
- The Structural Transformation of the Economy Could Only Be Achieved Through Government Intervention.
- The Structuralist Policies Enjoyed Limited Success.
- The Linear-Stages-of-Growth Model: The Western European View of Economic Development
- Neo-Marxist Approach: Advanced Capitalist Countries Exploit
Developing Countries
- Neo-Marxist Development Theory Focused on the Relationships Between Advanced Capitalist Countries and Developing Countries.
- The Neo-Marxists Argued that Many Developing Countries Could Not Pass Through an Advanced Capitalist Stage Before Moving to Socialism.
- Neo-Marxist Theory was Provocative but Flawed and Too Formalistic.
- The Neo-Classical Revival: Private Markets, Not Government Intervention, Are Critical for Development

previous 