008:270—Studies in Modernism/Postmodernism:

Postmodern Literature, Culture, and Theory

 

Instructor: Rob Latham

 

Course Times: Tuesdays, 7-9:30 PM, in 312 EPB

Office Hours: Tues, 4-5:30 PM, in 455 EPB; Wed, 2:30-4 PM, in 401 Jefferson

E-mail/Phone: rob-latham@uiowa.edu; 335-0465 (EPB office); 335-0035 (JB office)

 

Required Texts (at Prairie Lights Bookstore):

Donald Barthelme, Snow White

Joan Didion, Play It As It Lays

Ishmael Reed, Mumbo Jumbo

         Thomas Pynchon, Gravity’s Rainbow

         Joseph McElroy, Lookout Cartridge

         Kathy Acker, Blood and Guts in High School

         Don DeLillo, The Names

         William Gaddis, Carpenter’s Gothic

         Toni Morrison, Beloved

Also Required (to be purchased used or ordered online):

Walter Abish, Alphabetical Africa

Stephen Wright, Going Native

Recommended Text (at Prairie Lights):

          Stephen Weisenberger,  A “Gravity’s Rainbow” Companion

Also Required (available at Zephyr Copies):

         Course Reader

 

Description: This course brings representative works of postmodernist fiction into alignment with major conceptual models of postmodernity and significant theorizations of postmodernism in literature. The goal of the course is to use theory and fiction to mutually illuminate one another and the postmodern condition they both embody and critique.

 

Requirements and Assignments: The first requirement is preparation and attendance. Because we meet only once per week, and because the material we’ll cover builds cumulatively, missing class for any reason short of serious illness or other major emergency is not a good idea. Also, your consistent participation in dialogue—based on a focused and critical engagement with the course materials—is absolutely essential to the success of this course. An evaluation of your contribution to class discussion will form a major part of my assessment of your final grade.

         The required writing is as follows: twelve brief (1-2 page) response papers and a final 15-page essay. The response papers, which should focus on the texts we have read in common, can be expository (explaining some issue or implication in the texts), critical (arraigning the texts on the basis of factual or ideological problems), and/or quizzical (formulating questions to be addressed in our collective response to the texts). Your responses need not address all of the texts assigned in a given week, but they should make an effort to be as synthetic as possible, in particular by drawing the “primary” texts (the novels) into conversation with the “secondary” texts (the critical essays, book chapters, etc.). Feel free to use these papers to stake out strong positions and to engage the assigned materials forcefully, though knee-jerk emotional responses should be eschewed. You’re required to produce a total of twelve of these responses over the course of the semester; these responses will not be graded individually, but a cumulative grade will be assigned to them at semester’s end. I’ll write extensive comments on the responses and return them promptly, so you should have a good sense of how you’re doing from week to week.

In most cases, the responses will be collected before class begins on Tuesdays. Three times during the semester, however, you’ll be required to circulate your responses to the class via email by 5 PM on the preceding Monday evenings. Each student will also be required, once during the semester, to act as an oral respondent to the papers that have been thus circulated. These respondents will kick off our discussions by offering brief (7-8 minute) remarks, drawing relevant connections among the papers and raising further questions. Respondents may work from notes, but should not simply read prepared remarks; rather, they should offer extemporaneous—and relatively engaging—comments intended to elicit thoughtful reactions from the class. Indeed, the respondents will essentially function as discussion leaders for roughly the first half-hour of each class meeting. Depending on final enrollments, there should be an average of four circulated papers and one oral respondent per class session. (See handout for schedule.)

The final paper is geared to show your ability to bring literature and theory into fruitful dialogue with one another by drawing upon selected “primary” and “secondary” texts from the syllabus in some synthetic fashion. You are strongly urged to avoid narrowly reductive arguments in which literary texts are seen as mere illustrations of theoretical positions; rather, you should use literature and theory to interrogate and complicate one another. You may, if you wish, bring in materials not included on the syllabus so long as they are clearly relevant and your treatment of them does not swamp your coverage of the assigned texts. I’ll have much more to say about this assignment later in the semester.

 

Grading: The distribution of your grade will be as follows: 20% class participation (including in-class oral response); 30% response papers; and 50% final paper. 

 

 

Weekly Schedule:

 

Week 1. (8/24)

John Barth, “Lost in the Funhouse” (1967)

-----, “The Literature of Exhaustion” (1967)

-----, “The Literature of Replenishment” (1980)

 

Week 2. (8/31)

Donald Barthelme, Snow White (1968)

Raymond Federman, “Surfiction: Four Propositions In Form of An Introduction” (1975)

         Fredric Jameson, “Postmodernism and Consumer Society” (1982)

 

Week 3. (9/7)

Joan Didion, Play It As It Lays (1970)

Ihab Hassan, “The Literature of Silence” (1967)

Alan Wilde, “A Map of Suspensiveness: Irony in the Postmodern Age” (1987)

 

Week 4. (9/14)

Ishmael Reed, Mumbo Jumbo (1972)

Linda Hutcheon, “Historiographic Metafiction” (1988)

-----, “Intertextuality, Parody, and the Discourses of History” (1988)

 

Week 5. (9/21)

Walter Abish, Alphabetical Africa (1974)

Gerald Graff, “The Politics of Anti-Realism” (1979)

         Marcel Benabou, “Rule and Constraint” (1983)

 

Week 6. (9/28)

Thomas Pynchon, Gravity’s Rainbow (1973), through p. 278

Timothy Melley, “Agency Panic and the Culture of Conspiracy” (2002)

 

Week 7. (10/5)

         Pynchon, Gravity’s Rainbow, though p. 532

         Zygmunt Bauman, “A Sociological Theory of Postmodernity” (1992)

        

Week 8. (10/12)

         Pynchon, Gravity’s Rainbow, through p. 760

         Brian McHale, “Modernist Reading, Postmodernist Text: The Case of ­Gravity's

Rainbow” (1979)

 

Week 9. (10/19)

         Joseph McElroy, Lookout Cartridge (1974), through p. 257

Stanley Aronowitz, “Postmodernism and Politics” (1992)

 

Week 10. (10/26)

         McElroy, Lookout Cartridge (1974), through p. 531

         John Johnston, “Narrative, Delirium, Machinic Consciousness: Lookout Cartridge

(1998)

        

Week 11. (11/2)

Kathy Acker, Blood and Guts in High School (1978)

Luce Irigaray, “Women on the Market” (1978)

Judith Butler, “Bodily Inscriptions, Performative Subversions” (1990)

 

Week 12. (11/9)

Don DeLillo, The Names (1982)

Iain Chambers, “Migrant Landscapes” (1994)

 

Week 13. (11/16)

         William Gaddis, Carpenter’s Gothic (1985)

         David Harvey, “Time-Space Compression and the Postmodern Condition” (1989)

 

Week 14. (11/23)

         Thanksgiving break

 

Week 15. (11/30)

         Toni Morrison, Beloved (1988)

         Hayden White, “Interpretation in History” (1972)

         bell hooks, “Postmodern Blackness” (1990) – available online at:

<http://www.iath.virginia.edu/pmc/text-only/issue.990/hooks.990>

 

Week 16. (12/7)

Stephen Wright, Going Native (1992)

Jean Baudrillard, “The Precession of Simulacra” (1981)

-----,  “The Ecstasy of Communication” (1983)

 

Exam Week

         Final papers due in my mailbox in 310 EPB by 5 PM Thursday, 12/16