Photography (and Graphics) for Editors

Editors tend to be "word people." But they still need to recognize a good visual when they see one -- and then to know how to do it justice.

Here are some hallmarks of a good photo:

* Every good photo has a clean, clear center of interest -- a focal point or a center of visual impact that draws the viewer's eye to it.
*  Good photos are natural -- they show real people doing real things, rather than posed shots of people not doing much of anything.

Good photos commonly include motion or emotion. Just as you want to use strong action words when you write, you want photos to be strong, artistically pleasing and visually compelling.

Human faces often make good focal points for strong photos. In general, faces in a photo should be at least the size of a dime so we can see them clearly.

* Good photos often follow the "rule of thirds."

This guideline suggests that you can think of a photo as divided into thirds, horizontally and vertically, something like this:

     
     
     

The focal point will be near one of the intersections where a horizontal line crosses a vertical line.

That placement is often the most visually interesting option because it creates asymmetry or a bit of artistic imbalance -- and thus a bit of tension or motion within the photo.

* Good photos are relevant to the photo they are trying to tell. Like any other journalistic message, photos tell a story.

Your task as editor is to select the best photo for the story you want to tell -- and to display that photo big enough for it to do its job.

That last point bears repeating in a box by itself: Big Is Beautiful.

Effective photos draw readers into the page and into the stories on that page. So you want to run the photos big enough to achieve that impact.

It's better to use fewer large photos than a lot of small ones.

(That said, if you use multiple photos in a package or "photo spread," they should be of varying sizes. More on design to come!)

Photos can run in a publication ...

* With stories. The technical term for these is "photos that run with stories."

* Without stories. These are called standalone photos or, less commonly, wild art.

These can be used to tell a story all by themselves. Or they can serve as promotional devices for a separate story elsewhere in the publication. (For instance, you might use a standalone on the front page and write a cutline that refers readers to more details in a story on page 5A, say.)

The content of the photo determines its optimal shape. But basically, photos, especially news photos, are usually rectangular, either horizontal ...

 

 

 

 

 

... or vertical.

 

Square photos are rare in newspapers because it's a boring, static shape.

(Yes, you can run cutouts and silhouettes and other creatively cool configurations. Those work well when used to achieve a specific effect on splashy feature pages. On basic news pages, your best options are generally more sedate.)

Most photos need to be both cropped and sized.

* Cropping means cutting the clutter out of a photo. The goal is to enhance the impact of the photo's focal point and therefore increase its storytelling power.

Different crops will tell different stories. For instance, a crop that focuses tightly on a person's face can be used to show emotion or character. One that shows more background can be used to convey something about the person's environment.

* Editors adjust a photo's size -- making it larger or smaller than the original -- depending on the needs of the story and of the page design.

But be careful not to create distortion when you resize a photo. Height and width must be changed proportionately. If you change one dimension without a corresponding adjustment to the other, you will create a fun-house mirror sort of photo.

The Editorial Eye has excellent information about the ethics of photo editing.

It's very easy to digitally manipulate a photo. Some manipulation (such as enhancement of contrast between foreground and background) is acceptable. But anything that changes the story the photo tells is an unacceptable breach of faith with viewers, who expect photos in your publication to reflect the reality the photographer saw.

All photos should have both a credit line and a cutline:

* A credit line is the photographer's equivalent of a reporter's byline. (So you want to remember to include it.)

The credit line generally runs in small type just below and to the right of the photo.

Each publication has its own style for credit lines. As an editor, all you have to do is know the style and remember to include the credit line.

Example of a credit line:

Rachel Mummey/The Daily Iowan

* The cutline or caption uses text to complement the story that the photo tells visually.

Use the cutline to answer questions not clearly answered in the photo -- to tell the viewer what the photo fails to show and to address any ambiguities.

For instance, cutlines should always identify the "who" -- the people in the photo. They typically also include the "when" and the "where," along with the "what" (if it's not obvious from the photo).

Good cutlines also add context and detail. In just a sentence or two, they tell a little mini-story, informing the majority of your readers -- the ones who will look at the photo, read the headline and read the cutline ... but will not read the story.

Three more points about cutlines (see The Editorial Eye for more):

* Much of the basic information for the cutline comes from the photographer. (Check for accuracy of spellings, especially names.) The rest comes from the reporter -- from within the story.

* Don't insult the reader's intelligence by stating what's obvious in the photo.

For instance, if the photo shows a man and a woman, you don't have to say "Joe Smith, left." (If it shows two men, on the other hand, you do need to let the reader know which one is Joe.) If the photo shows a guy walking his dog, there's no need for a cutline that says "Joe Smith walks his dog." And so on.

Look for ways to convey details that the photo does not or cannot convey on its own.

* The first sentence of a cutline is written in present tense, which lends a sense of immediacy.

The first sentence also provides the basic information contained in the photo, helping people understand what they're looking at.

The second and subsequent sentences of a cutline (if any) may be written in either present tense (for ongoing action) or past tense (for background). They provide additional information about the story surrounding the photo. Obviously, standalone photos commonly need longer cutlines than photos that run with a story.

Standalone photos (those that run without a story) also should have a slug line, also sometimes called an "overline." (Some publications include slug lines with all photos, but most newspapers reserve them for standalones.)

A slug line is to a cutline what a label headline is to a story. In just two or three catchy (ideally) words, a slug ...

* Introduces the photo and cutline.

* Draws the reader's eye thanks to type that's bigger and bolder than the cutline itself.

* Time and creative juices permitting, says something clever.

Publications of all sorts also make extensive use of infographics (sometimes called just "graphics"), which combine illustrations and information to quickly and clearly tell a visual story.

Infographics include everything from maps to diagrams to timelines to charts to ... well, just about anything you can think of.

The Editorial Eye offers a bunch of useful information about the various kinds of infographics and how to use them. Here are just a few highlights:

* Think about asking for an infographic if you have a story that contains a lot of details that can bog down the flow of the text (or that the writer is struggling to integrate seamlessly).

Something as simple as a table or chart (which you often can create yourself) can be quite effective in conveying this sort of information, especially for details involving numbers. Tables and charts, along with other sorts of sidebar boxes, also nicely break up a big block of text.

More complex graphics such as maps or diagrams can be great for both "selling" and "telling" a story.

* Infographics typically combine visual and verbal elements, including:

*  A slug line (again, a mini-headline).

* "Chatter," the words providing verbal context for the visual element(s).

This should be carefully researched information, which comes from the artist, the writer ... and you, the editor.

Think about what info you already know, what you don't know but wish you did ... and, importantly, what you don't really need to include. Too much text can clutter up a good graphic and be distracting.

* A compelling, appropriate visual presentation, which the artist creates.
* The source of the original information (for instance, a government agency or university study or whatever).
* A credit line for the artist.

* As an editor, you should know which graphic is best for a particular task. For instance, if you're helping the artist choose among different kinds of charts or graphs ...

*  Bar charts show relationships between or among items on the chart.

* Pie charts show the division of a unit into smaller pieces.

* Fever charts (also called line graphs or run charts) show trends, or changes over time.