Diversity
... Plus Closing Comments from Merrill and The E of J

In the last chapter of his book, Merrill offers an Aristotelian approach to resolving tensions between freedom and responsibility, libertarianism and communitarianism, and the various other dichotomies he has raised.

He recommends something he calls ethical mutualism, a moderate middle ground that combines respect for society with respect for the individual.

Ethical mutualism also involves a combination of the direct and indirect view of ethics:

"Ethical journalists will try to develop a moral character (the indirect view) while they also consider the importance of specific acts in particular situations as they arise (the direct view)" (Journalism Ethics, p. 220).

In other words, ethics are both personal and practical. Being ethical requires having a moral sense or a conscience, as well as a commitment to try to think rationally and act ethically. But although ethics draws on theory and philosophy, it ultimately is something you do in real situations, not just something you think about:

"Ethical foundations are practical, useful and have a purpose.

"Ethics in journalism has to do with `right' (or `better') actions that will accomplish some pragmatic goal, such as leading to a better understanding, bringing more happiness, enlarging the dimensions of truth available to the public, improving social institutions, or pleasing one's god or one's self" (Journalism Ethics, p. 221).

Chapter 8 of The Elements of Journalism relates most directly to one of next week's topics, infotainment. But I thought it would be good to finish the book before the second test!

The principle the authors offer here is:

"Journalists must make the significant interesting and relevant" (Elements of Journalism, p. 148).

Journalism is not something different from good storytelling. Journalism is good storytelling -- telling stories whose purpose is providing people with information they need to understand the world.

The argument that such journalism doesn't sell is nonsense. Sure, we all want to be entertained sometimes -- and we have plenty of media options when we do. We turn to journalists for information that we know matters, information that is relevant to our lives.

Unfortunately, the organizations that journalists work for are less and less committed to providing it. Good journalism is hard, time-consuming and expensive. The problem is particularly acute at local television news stations. But it is evident in the content provided other media outlets, both local and national, as well.

Ultimately, the authors say, attracting audiences by being merely engaging will fair as a long-term business strategy for journalism. Here's why:

* People who are fed only trivia and entertainment will lose their appetite for anything else.

They will not suddenly decide they want better journalism. They'll spend their lives consuming the equivalent of media junk food.

* A strategy based on delivering infotainment destroys a news organization's authority to deliver more serious news. And it drives away members of the audience who want it.

* Turning news into entertainment plays to the strengths of other media.

"How can the news ever compete with entertainment on entertainment's terms? Why would it want to?

"The value and allure of news is different. It is based on relevance.

"The strategy of infotainment, though it may attract an audience in the short run and may be cheap to produce, will build a shallow audience because it is built on form, not substance. Such an audience will switch to the next `most exciting' thing because it was built on the spongy ground of excitement in the first place" (Elements of Journalism, pp. 154-155).

In the last chapter, the Elements of Journalism authors strike a note similar to Merrill's. At the end of the day, journalists must have an obligation to personal conscience:

"Every journalist -- from the newsroom to the boardroom -- must have a personal sense of ethics and responsibility -- a moral compass. ...

"Journalists live and die by their reputation as people with ethics. It's all they have" (Elements of Journalism, pp. 181, 185).

Moreover, journalists have a responsibility to express their conscience -- and to allow others to do so as well. The authors emphasize the importance of open communication, especially among people who may see things differently.

This idea is directly connected with true diversity. It's important for newsrooms to more closely resemble, and to truly reflect, the culture at large. But, the authors point out, merely adding people of varying backgrounds risks confusing means with ends:

"Getting more minorities in the newsroom is a target, but not the goal, of diversity. The goal is a more accurate news organization. Ethnic, gender and racial quotas are a means of approaching that. But they will accomplish nothing in themselves if the newsroom culture then requires that these people from different background all adhere to a single mentality.

"The goal of diversity should be to assemble not only a newsroom that might resemble the community but one that is also ... open and honest so that this diversity can function.

"This is not racial or gender diversity. It is not ideological diversity. It is not numerical diversity. It is ... intellectual diversity, and it encompasses and gives meaning to all the other kinds" (Elements of Journalism, pp. 188-189).

Finally, the authors conclude with the role of citizens -- of all of us. We all have a responsibility for making a society based on information work.

Journalists can do a better job, not only their daily practice but also through a commitment to letting people in on how and why news decisions are made.

But ultimately, members of the society as a whole will determine what they want that society to be:

"History has taught us by bloody experience what happens to a society in which the citizens act on the basis of self-interested information -- whether it is the propaganda of a despotic state or the edicts of a sybaritic leisure class substituting bread and circuses for sovereignty. ...

"Six billion people have no access to a free press, and the 1.2 billion who do are increasingly served by a press in service more to private profit than public interest.

"Civilization has produced one idea more powerful than any other -- the notion that people can govern themselves. And it has created a largely unarticulated theory of information to sustain that idea, called journalism. The two rise and fall together" (Elements of Journalism, p. 193).

Here's a question you may be asking (even if you don't ask it out loud): Isn't attention to diversity really just a matter of political correctness?

Why does it matter if the folks bringing you the news look alike and come from similar backgrounds? And the sources they quote look alike, too? Isn't the important thing that they are the best journalists and the best sources?

Being the best is important, yes. But this isn't about "PC" so much as it is about truth.

Truth is multi-faceted. It is most likely to emerge when we are able to look at the world through many sets of eyes. To seek and report as much of the truth as possible -- to tell a complete story -- we must see it from as many perspectives as possible.

The methods of journalism, such as the processes and principles of verification we discussed last week, transcend the differences among us. But the stories we perceive in the first place will vary. The more, the merrier!

Here are some recent data on newsroom staffing:

* Newspapers (ASNE, 2004 data)

* 13.42 percent of the 54,134 full-time journalists in newspaper newsrooms in 2004 were minorities. That is about half a percentage point more than the previous year.

Among the U.S. population as a whole, just over 30 percent are non-Hispanic whites, according to 2000 Census Bureau data. (The percentage is estimated to have risen to about 33 percent by 2005.)

* Asians and Latinos accounted for most of the change from the previous year.

Newspaper newsrooms added a net of 365 Asian-Americans and 259 Latinos, but only 46 Native Americans and 34 African-Americans.

* About 60 percent of all U.S. daily newspapers have at least one minority staffer. Among those that do not, most have circulations of 10,000 or less and serve small communities.
* Minorities account for 10.8 percent of all newspaper newsroom supervisors.

* The percentage of women in daily newspaper newsrooms increased slightly in 2004, to about 37.5 percent.

About 35 percent of newsroom supervisors are women.

Overall, newsroom staffing fell 4 percent between 2001 and 2005. Newsrooms lost nearly 1,000 reporters, nearly 600 editors, nearly 300 photographers and artists, and more than 400 copy editors. (That said, surveys of recent JMC graduates indicate the situation may be improving a bit as the economy perks up again.)

* Radio and television (RTNDA, 2005 data)

* Minorities make up 21.2 percent of the television workforce but only 7.9 percent of the radio workforce.

Taking Hispanic TV stations out of the mix drops the percentage to 19.5 percent.

* About half the minorities in television are African-American.

Almost all the minorities in radio are Hispanic.

* Minorities account for 11 (radio) or 12 (television) percent of all broadcast news directors.

In both media, Hispanics make up the largest single group of minority managers. In radio, there were no African-American or Asian-American news directors in 2005.

As for television general managers, fewer than 7 percent are minorities. In radio, only 3.4 percent of GMs are minorities.

* In the largest (top 25) television markets, minorities made up an average of 29 percent of the workforce -- about twice the percentage in the smallest markets.

Radio stations in major markets averaged a minority workforce of about 10.5 percent. In medium markets, the percentage dropped to 2.5.

* Women make up 39.3 percent of the television workforce and 27.5 percent of the radio workforce.

In television, the percentage of women varies very little with market size. In radio, the percentages are significantly higher in major and large markets than in smaller ones.

About 21.3 percent of television news directors are women; for radio, the figure is about 24.7 percent. Women make up 17 percent of the television general managers and about 21 percent of radio GMs.

* FYI, additional information about diversity and related resources for news organizations are available from the Freedom Forum.

Obviously, the news media face something of a challenge in this area.

Here are some things individual journalists can do in the meantime to try to avoid grossly distorting the truth. These are from the Poynter Institute and New Directions for News, now part of the American Press Institute:

Avoid all-too-common stereotypes.

Ask yourself: "Would I say the same thing about an affluent white Christian man?"

Common racial (in particular) stereotypes:

* The secondary (the "little people").

* The ignored and invisible.

* The achievers, exceptions to "norm."

* The despised and feared.

A few practical tips for diversifying news content:

* Visit new communities to develop sources, ideas.

* ... And take others from the newsroom along. Set up meetings with local residents and leaders.

* Treat all your sources and subjects as real people, with friends, interests, jobs ... just like you.

* Subscribe to alternative publications in the newsroom. You'll learn, among other things, that all communities are diverse, not monolithic.

* Do a content analysis now and then to see how, and how often, you portray community groups.

Or, of course, you could simply follow Gannett's approach to diversity.

As described in "Just Add Color," Gannett (which owns more papers than any other U.S. chain, including the Register and Press-Citizen), follows a policy it calls "mainstreaming."

It wants minority voices be heard every day in every paper. Its goal is to provide a news product that is inclusive of all members of society.

At the Greenville (SC) News, for example, two "goals" (reporters describe them as mandates) have been set for meeting this policy:

1) Each section's front page must have at least one minority quote every day.

2) All stories not prompted by breaking news must quote at least one minority.

What do you think of:

* The company's policy?

* The approach to meeting the policy's goals?
* The results?

Coverage of Hurricane Katrina last fall, and its aftermath, also raised numerous issues related to race -- a subject Ashley K. wrote about a few weeks ago on our blog, prompting very thoughtful responses from several of you.

The article you read for this week offers a variety of suggestions for producing good journalism about those important issues, particularly for strong storytelling that connects issues of class, of immigration policy, of labor issues and more.

All the journalists quoted in the article emphasized finding ways to convey the complexity of U.S. society in general and of what happened (and continues to happen) in New Orleans in particular.

"Spend more time where people live, go to school, where they shop and where they work. ...

"New cultural configurations are replacing an old Black/White paradigm. New, more nuanced reporting and writing must replace the old, conventional conflict-oriented race relations coverage. ...

"That requires us to observe and report what's happening now so we can better understand the face of things yet to come" ("Covering Race: Back to the Future," Colon, poynteronline.com).