|
PARENT-TEACHER
COMMUNICATION
|
Home Advantage
Annette Lareau
Details of the study
Lareau investigated two distinct areas of a California community. Upper middle-class families and blue-collar families were represented
Many analyses of behavior were conducted. Only a small portion of the finds are reported
Social class differences
Upper-middle-class parents have the capacity to understand the diagnostic and instructional language used by teachers, or, more generally, the competence to help their children at school. Most of the time these parents could easily handle the materials presented to their children in school
More differences...
Social status itself also provided a resource
Upper-middle-class parents approached teachers as social equals. Social status provided these parents with confidence in the school environment
Status influenced parent beliefs in their proper role in schooling, especially their rights and responsibilities
More...
Income and material resources played a role in facilitating family-school relations. Transportation and money were not concerns of the upper-middle-class group studied
Style, routine, and purpose of parents' work affected relations. Upper-middle-class parents have a pattern of interconnectedness between home and work
More...
Networks, themselves linked to social class position, provided parents with different amounts of general information about schooling. Social networks mediated connections to the school.
Higher social class provides parents with more resources to intervene in schooling and to connect with social institutions
Lareau argues
"The standard belief in the desirability of parent involvement rests on certain hidden pre-conditions. It is easier for upper-middle-class parents to comply with teachers' requests than for parents at a lower position in the social stratification system. The advice that parents receive differs in how closely it is aligned with the standards of the professionals."