Overview of Decision-Making Procedure for Promotion and Tenure

 

 

Text Box:   Sequential Development of Promotion Record through Decision-Makers:   1.       Candidate and DEO compile dossier 2.       Peer evaluation of teaching 3.       Internal peer evaluation of scholarship 4.       Peer evaluation of service 5.       Candidate’s opportunity to respond 6.       External peer evaluation of scholarship 7.       Departmental Consulting Group’s vote and report 8.       Candidate’s opportunity to respond 9.       DEO’s letter to Dean 10.   Candidate’s opportunity to respond, if DEO’s recommendation is negative 11.   Collegiate Consulting Group’s vote and summary report, if any* 12.   Candidate’s opportunity to respond* 13.   Dean’s letter to Provost 14.   Candidate’s opportunity to respond, if Dean’s recommendation is negative 15.   Provost’s recommendation to the Board of Regents   *If recommendation is negative and contrary to DEO or DCG recommendation     Text Box: Internal Peer Evaluation of Scholarship   Text Box: Peer Evaluation of Teaching   Text Box: (DEO)

  

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Text Box: Peer Evaluation of Service   Text Box: Departmental Consulting Group   Text Box: Collegiate Consulting Group   Text Box: Dean Text Box: Provost Text Box: Board of Regents Text Box: External Peer Evaluation of Scholarship   Text Box: (DEO) Text Box: DEO