Overview of Decision-Making Procedure for Promotion and Tenure

 

 

Text Box:  
Sequential Development of Promotion Record through Decision-Makers:
 
1.       Candidate and DEO compile dossier 
2.       Peer evaluation of teaching 
3.       Internal peer evaluation of scholarship
4.       Peer evaluation of service
5.       Candidateís opportunity to respond
6.       External peer evaluation of scholarship
7.       Departmental Consulting Groupís vote and report 
8.       Candidateís opportunity to respond
9.       DEOís letter to Dean
10.   Candidateís opportunity to respond, if DEOís recommendation is negative
11.   Collegiate Consulting Groupís vote and summary report, if any*
12.   Candidateís opportunity to respond*
13.   Deanís letter to Provost
14.   Candidateís opportunity to respond, if Deanís recommendation is negative
15.   Provostís recommendation to the Board of Regents
 
*If recommendation is negative and contrary to DEO or DCG recommendation
 
 
Text Box: Internal Peer Evaluation of Scholarship
 
Text Box: Peer Evaluation of 
Teaching
 
Text Box: (DEO)

  

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Text Box: Peer Evaluation of 
Service
 
Text Box: Departmental Consulting Group
 
Text Box: Collegiate Consulting Group
 
Text Box: Dean
Text Box: Provost
Text Box: Board of Regents
Text Box: External Peer Evaluation of Scholarship
 
Text Box: (DEO)
Text Box: DEO