Overview of Decision-Making Procedure for Clinical Track Promotion

 

 

Text Box:  
Sequential Development of Promotion Record through Decision-Makers:
 
1.       Candidate and DEO compile dossier 
2.       Peer evaluation of teaching 
3.       Internal peer evaluation of professional productivity
4.       Internal peer evaluation of clinical and other service
5.       Candidateís opportunity to respond
6.       External peer evaluation of professional productivity
7.       External peer evaluation of clinical and other service
8.       Departmental Consulting Groupís vote and report 
9.       Candidateís opportunity to respond
10.    DEOís letter to Dean
11.    Candidateís opportunity to respond, if DEOís recommendation is negative
12.    Collegiate Consulting Groupís vote and summary report, if any*
13.    Candidateís opportunity to respond*
14.    Deanís letter to Provost
15.    Candidateís opportunity to respond, if Deanís recommendation is negative
16.    Provostís recommendation to the Board of Regents
 
*If recommendation is negative and contrary to DEO or DCG recommendation
 
 
Text Box: Internal Peer Evaluation of Professional Productivity
 
Text Box: Peer Evaluation of 
Teaching
 
Text Box: Internal Peer Evaluation of 
Clinical and Other Service
 
Text Box: (DEO)

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

Text Box: Departmental Consulting Group
 
Text Box: Collegiate Consulting Group
 
Text Box: Dean
Text Box: Provost
Text Box: Board of Regents
Text Box: External Peer Evaluation of Professional Productivity
 
Text Box: (DEO)
Text Box: DEO
Text Box: External Peer Evaluation of Clinical and Other Service