Sheldon Kurtz
I have had a 32 year
commitment to teaching, scholarship, and service at The University of Iowa.
Perhaps most relevant to this election is my service to our University through
my involvement with numerous Senate and Charter committees over the last 25
years including Non-resident Tuition, Academic Computing, Budget and FRIC. In
addition I have served and/or chaired numerous special committees to develop
policies regarding the judicial commission, conflicts of interest and clinical
track faculty. Certainly, my prior service in the early 90s as Faculty Senate
President was one of the highlights of my service commitment. See generally, http://www.uiowa.edu/~sfklaw.
But, what
of the future? At this time I see two broad themes that
should dominate the Faculty Senate agenda. First, is faculty compensation and benefits. We frequently hear concerns about faculty retention
and we have concerns here that need to be addressed. But I believe more important
are the concerns we should have for initial hiring, transfers, and compression.
I believe we have a major tension between the important goals of hiring new
faculty, luring established faculty to our campus and equitably treating those
faculty who continue their commitment to this University (often without
thoughts of abandoning ship)and continue their contributions to the teaching,
scholarship and service mission to which we adhere. We need to develop a
compensation policy that addresses both of these issues simultaneously.
Second, is governance. Over the last few years I have sensed a
disturbing tendency to distance our faculty from the development of policies that affect our work life and working
conditions. In my mind it is not
sufficient that the role of the Senate be limited to reacting to policies
administratively created. We need to be involved in the development of those
policies so that faculty concerns can be addressed at the earliest stages and
before positions have hardened. Thus, we need to continuously insist upon our
involvement in this effort.