Announcements
Issue 98:4 Now Available
Issue 4 of Volume 98 is now available online and in print. The issue contains four articles, one essay, and four student-written notes.
Volume 99 Student Notes Selected for Publication
The Volume 98 Editorial Board is proud to announce the student notes selected for publication in Volume 99 of the Iowa Law Review. View the List
Student Note Recognized
The Iowa Law Review is proud to announce that Aaron Hersh's note, Rehabilitating Tinker: A Modest Proposal To Protect Public-School Students' First Amendment Free Expression Rights in the Digital Age, was featured in Iowa Now.
Volume 99 Editorial Board
The Volume 98 Editorial Board is proud to announce the incoming members of the
Volume 99 Editorial Board. View the Masthead.
Court Rules on Validity of Recess Appointments
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia recently ruled that President Obama's recess appointments to the NLRB in January 2012 were unconstitutional. For more on recess appointments during pro forma sessions, see Alex Kron's note, The Constitutional Validity of Pro Forma Recess Appointments: A Bright-Line Test Using a Substance-over-Form Approach.
Student Note Recognized
The Iowa Law Review is proud to announce that Gina Messamer's note, Iowa's All-Male Supreme Court, was featured in The Gazette (Cedar Rapids) and Iowa Now.
New Submission Process
Effective January 2013, the Iowa Law Review will only accept unsolicited manuscripts through Scholastica. Click here for more information.
Iowa Law Review Bulletin
Federalism and the Eighth Amendment
by Youngjae Lee
Responding to Mannheimer, Cruel and Unusual Federal Punishments
View Response View Article
The Great A&P and the Struggle for the Soul of Antitrust
by Sandeep Vaheesan
View Essay
What Does New Theory Contribute to the Evolution of the Tort of Medical Malpractice?
by Eleanor D. Kinney
Responding to Stein, Toward a Theory of Medical Malpractice
View Response View Article
The Problem of Line-Drawing
by Sarah B. Lawsky
Responding to Borden, Quantitative Model for Measuring Line-Drawing Inequity
View Response View Article
Judicial Deference to Congress and the Separation of Powers
by Louis J. Virelli III
Responding to Berger, Deference Determinations and Stealth Constitutional Decision Making
View Response View Article
Multiple Markets and the Justification of Contract
by Roy Kreitner
Responding to Oman, Markets as a Moral Foundation for Contract Law
View Response View Article
Authors’ Reply: The ALI Needs to Implement Modern Conflict of Interest Policies
by Elizabeth Laposata, Richard Barnes & Stanton Glantz
Responding to Ramo & Liebman, The ALI’s Response to the Center for Tobacco Control Research & Education
View Authors' Reply View Response View Article
A Study in Detection: The Who and Why of the Health Care Joint Dissent
by Laura Krugman Ray
View Essay
The ALI’s Response to the Center for Tobacco Control Research & Education
by Roberta Cooper Ramo and Lance Liebman
Responding to Laposata et al.Tobacco Industry Influence on the American Law Institute’s Restatement of Torts and Implications for Its Conflict of Interest Policies
View Response View Article
Balancing and the Unauthorized Disclosure of National Security Information
by Mary-Rose Papandrea
Responding to Fenster, Disclosure's Effects: WikiLeaks and Transparency
View Response View Article
Privacy & the Personal Prospectus: Should We Introduce Privacy Agents or Regulate Privacy Intermediaries?
by Scott R. Peppet
Responding to Kang et al., Self-Surveillance Privacy
View Response View Article
WikiLeaks as a Transparency Hard-Case
by Roy Peled
Responding to Fenster, Disclosure's Effects: WikiLeaks and Transparency
View Response View Article
Contextualizing Disclosure’s Effects: WikiLeaks, Balancing, and the First Amendment
by Christina E. Wells
Responding to Fenster, Disclosure's Effects: WikiLeaks and Transparency
View Response View Article
Supreme Court Opinions and the Justices Who Cite Them: A Response to Cross
by Corey Rayburn Yung
Responding to Cross, The Ideology of Supreme Court Opinions and Citations
View Response View Article
Habeas Corpus, Protection, and Extraterritorial Constitutional Rights: A Reply to Stephen Vladeck's "Insular Thinking About Habeas"
by Andrew Kent
Responding to Vladeck, Insular Thinking About Habeas
View Response View Article
Direct Employer Liability for Punitive Damages
by Sandra F. Sperino
Responding to Seiner, Punitive Damages, Due Process, and Employment Discrimination
View Response View Article
Insular Thinking About Habeas
by Stephen I. Vladeck
Responding to Kent, Boumediene, Munaf, and the Supreme Court’s Misreading of the Insular Cases
View Response View Article
Why Crime Severity Analysis is Not Reasonable
by Christopher Slobogin
Responding to Bellin, Crime-Severity Distinctions and the Fourth Amendment: Reassessing Reasonableness in a Changing World
View Response View Article