Keith
T. Poole
and Howard Rosenthal
d-nominate
after 10 Years:
A Comparative Update to Congress: A
Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting
Legislative
Studies Quarterly XXVI:5-29
This paper updates the findings in Congress: A Political-Economic
History of Roll-Call Voting and compares them to findings for both European
legislatures and the United Nations General Assembly. Congress argues
that important episodes in American political and economic history can be better
understood by supplementing or reinterpreting more traditional analyses with the
basic space theory of ideology. In Congress, we measured ideology with d-nominate
scores. Here we summarize new estimations that are complete through the
105th Congress. We find that the trend to polarization and unidimensionality
identified in Congress has continued unabated. The shift to Republican
control after the 1994 elections is part of this trend and does not represent a
sharp break in roll-call-voting behavior. Comparison of nominate
results for the United States to those for other legislatures both further
indicates the ideological character of roll-call voting in Congress and suggests
that low-dimensional spatial models apply as well to multiparty systems as to
two-party systems.