|
 You’ve
been the University of Iowa president for more than half a year now.
Have your goals for the University changed?
My
goals have not changed. They still include maintaining the excellence
of the core undergraduate disciplines, and protecting those disciplines
within that group, especially the arts and humanities, that do not
have access to external resources on their own, in an attempt to buffer
the effects of state shortfalls. I intend to continue emphasizing the
importance of diversity, particularly in the context of the recent
Supreme Court decisions on the cases at Michigan. I also intend to
maintain a collaborative, responsive posture to the state’s desire
to have the University do whatever it can, including economic development
activities, to help our state climb out of a financial hole that we’re
in.
Since I last communicated
with parents through Parent Times and with the Parents Association
board in person, I’ve realized the extent to which the state
is really focusing on those activities that we do in economic development.
So I’m reemphasizing in my discussions with legislators and others
that the University is pleased—more than pleased—we’re
eager to be active in economic development, but that we cannot be primarily
judged by our activities in economic development. We have to be judged
primarily by how we deal with 20,000 undergraduates and thousands of
graduate and professional students and how we do scholarly activities.
There
have been a number of changes in the structure of the administration.
Please talk about them and what they mean for undergraduate students.
Changes
are occurring in response to the goals I’ve outlined. I wanted
to increase the responsibility in the provost’s office, first
of all because I believe it’s appropriate to emphasize the role
of the chief academic officer, the provost, and because it brings us
more in line with other peer institutions. If we’re going to
make some changes, it seems to me that a very opportune time to do
so would be while we are hiring a new provost. [A national search for
the new provost is under way.]
Changes include
moving the oversight of Information Technology Services from the research
office to the provost’s office, with a strong participation by
the vice president for research and the vice president for finance
and operations and University treasurer, Doug True. Also, we will be
involving the provost as a partner with True in the initiation of the
University budgeting process each year. This will serve to make sure
that our emphasis is very carefully focused on both the academic and
nonacademic priorities of the University. In addition, I’ve asked
Doug True to help me oversee the athletic department, as I’ve
taken that on as a direct report.
Moving athletics
to direct oversight by the Office of the President was also a response
to my view that we had a model quite different from the majority of
our peer institutions, including Iowa State, where the athletic director
reports directly to the president with help from another senior officer.
So those were examples of changes that were proactive and follow up
on ideas that I’ve had for some time.
Another change was
in response to Vice President for Health Affairs Robert Kelch’s
decision to accept an offer at the University of Michigan. [Skorton
has decided not to replace the vice president for health affairs at
this time, but rather have the dean of the College of Medicine, Jean
Robillard, for the patient-care aspect of his position, and the director
and CEO of University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Donna Katen-Bahensky,
for all her functions, report directly to him.]
I’ve witnessed
six forms of governance for the health sciences since I came to Iowa,
and I participated in aspects of five of those different governance
systems. In 1996, President Mary Sue Coleman asked me to oversee the
health sciences center for one year, as a special assistant to her.
I also organized a review to recommend to her what to do about future
governance, and our committee recommended that we not have a vice president
for health sciences. Although it had been very effective, I thought
it was reasonable and possible to remove an entire layer of administrative
activity. So I guess it’s predictable that I would again want
to try to operate without a vice president, at least for the time being.
Right now I’m
comfortable doing this. I think the ability to work a system like this
is dependent to some extent on the particular background that I have.
If a president was in a field very distant from the health sciences,
it might not be the best-advised thing to do, but I’m comfortable
doing it. [Skorton is a cardiologist, who still sees patients at UIHC.]
I would like to
reassure our parents, many of whom have children who are in a the pre-health
science area, and all of whom have children who depend on things like
Student Health Service and at times the University of Iowa Hospitals
and Clinics to keep their kids healthy, that this will not affect either
the opportunities for learning or the excellent health care provided
for students.
Have
you been able to have much contact with students?
It
hasn’t been enough yet. I’m not happy with the amount of
contact I’ve been able to have. I do meet regularly with leadership
of UISG (University of Iowa Student Government) and I have met with
other student organizations. I’ve just begun to meet with The
Daily Iowan staff for regular conversations and Q&As. I’ve
been asking student leaders and other students I meet here, there,
and everywhere, how I can have more meaningful conversations with students.
They’ve recommended some variations on things like Mary Sue Coleman’s
fireside chats, so we’ll be trying some of these ideas in the
fall semester. And I have had a chance to visit with the Parents Association
board once already and intend to do that on a regular basis.
What
other issues would you like to discuss with parents?
A
few parents have asked me, “What will you do to improve the environment
to prevent and deal with sexual assault and violence on campus?” [An
investigation of a recent case led to concerns about the best way for
the University to handle this kind of situation.] Sandy Boyd [UI president
emeritus] had charged three reviews of various aspects of University
procedures, policies, and the campus climate. We have received two
of those reports and I have accepted virtually all the recommendations,
and we are in the process, with all dispatch, of implementing those
recommendations.
What
other issues or concerns have parents shared with you?
I’ve
had the opportunity to meet a number of parents, at the Parents Association
board meeting, at the Best of Class events, at orientation during the
summer, and of course they want to know what’s going on with
tuition. Just to reemphasize what I’ve mentioned before—we
still have the lowest tuition in the Big Ten and we are still a terrific
value for the quality of education here. Nevertheless, the unpredictability
and rapidity of the rise in tuition is a big concern to me and to the
Board of Regents. And while Iowa’s university presidents don’t
set tuition—the Board of Regents does—I anticipate that
tuition will not rise at the same rate, but that it will continue to
rise because of real costs and because of shortfalls in the budget.
How
does the recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court on affirmative
action at the University of Michigan affect The University of Iowa?
The
Supreme Court did not reject the concept that race could be taken into
account as one factor in admissions—they did not reject that,
which would have meant a complete overturning of the Bakke decision.
They did reject the undergraduate point system that Michigan has had.
We don’t have a point system here, we don’t have set-asides,
and we don’t have quotas. I don’t believe that these Supreme
Court decisions will materially affect our admissions process, but
just to be sure, we’re reviewing everything in our admissions
policies. So the bottom line on this is that we were on the right side
of the law to start with and we’re going to continue to emphasize
the legitimacy and importance of diversifying our campus.
|