Go to the Morphing Textbook Home Page

Go to the University of Iowa Rhetoric Department Home Page
A 10:002 or 10:003 Unit ~ The Myth of the Model Family

Schedule

Formal Assignments

Assigned: [date]
Workshop: [date]
Due: [date]

For this assignment, you’ll be leading the class in a 45-minute discussion on an assigned reading. This assignment involves some very rhetoric-y skills:

  • Rhetorical analysis
  • Contextualizing–linking the reading to broader social controversies
  • Researching those controversies

It also involves some real-world speaking skills:

  • Preparing relevant information for your audience and conveying it in a useful way
  • Asking provocative questions
  • Encouraging participation from the class, and using that participation in a thoughtful way

Your task, as you know, has two main thrusts:
Help us find our way through this piece

  • What rhetorical strategies did this writer use? (Look at that “How To Analyze” handout for more explanation–those are the elements you’ll want to be sure to address.)
  • What strategies worked?
  • Which ones didn’t?
  • Which ones should you, as writers and speakers, steal or avoid?
  • What makes this piece persuasive to you?

Help us understand the larger social controversy at the heart of this piece.

  • Identify it
  • Research it
  • Tell us what’s at stake, who’s affected, what viewpoints members of each side hold

Details: You and your partner are required to meet with me at least a week in advance of your presentation. Come with some reading under your belt, and a plan for the controversy you’ll present. We’ll all work together on the analysis, if you need that, and on presentation strategies.

You’ll assign the class a Reader Response question. (We can formulate it together, if you’d like.) You’ll need to okay the question with me before you assign it.

Length: Your presentation should last for approximately 45 minutes.

Grading: Your grade is based on these questions:

  • Did you convey an admirable understanding of the piece’s rhetorical devices?
  • Did you link the piece to a social controversy, placing it in the context of others we’ve read?
  • Was that controversy well-researched, and did you inform the class about more than one side of it?
  • Did the work (both behind the scenes and in front of the group) appear to be shared equally between the two of you?
  • Did you involve the class in relevant ways, picking up on good questions and encouraging new and innovative lines of discussion.

Hand in: your outline and your research sources (I require two, but strongly encourage more than two.)

top of page