Go to the Morphing Textbook Home Page

Go to the University of Iowa Rhetoric Department Home Page
A 10:001 or 10:003 Unit ~ Analysis and Mapping of Space and Place

Formal Assignments

There are several informal assignments within this unit.  These informal projects include:

The Place Game (informal assignment for participation grade)

  • In this game, student groups will develop and perform the same skit within different ‘environments’
  • Typically, I have several student groups ask for money from their grandparents (in their grandparents house), from their parents (in their dorm room or apartment), and from a friend in a bar.
  • Note: This is a fun exercise for students. It offers an opportunity to think about how place affects requests, discourses, etc.

Reading Responses

  • Reading responses range from one paragraph to one page.
  • These responses should offer analysis that takes into account the assigned readings or informal assignments for the day.

Speech Workshop (informal assignment for daily participation)

  • I have students team up and evaluate another pair's speech.
  • This includes "grading" the other team's outline.  Further, I have the pairs deliver their introductions and conclusions for another team.

Essay Workshop (informal assignment for daily participation)

  • I have students pair up and write written evaluations of another person's paper.
  • These evaluations include writing on the paper itself and filling out a 1-2 page evaluation form (included with this unit).

Designing a Mall (informal assignment for participation grade)

  • Materials Needed:  one piece of paper per group
  • This activity has students get into groups.  Students then design a mall for a particular audience.  The group should determine the audience age group, income-level, interests etc.  The groups should draw out their design and goals. The first part of this project should take approximately 20-25 minutes.
  • Student groups will design their mall with a theme or premise in mind and be able to explain the audience and theme to the rest of the class.
  • After student groups have designed their mall, groups should trade designs with another group.  The new group should use rhetorical terms to analyze the design of another group's mall. Groups should think about the assumptions evident in the design, what activities are privileged and the consumer aspects of the mall. Each group should present their findings.  The second half of this project should take approximately 20-25 minutes.
  • Note: This is an excellent activity to push students to question a strictly linear relationship between rhetor and audience.  Mall designs typically have multiple "rhetors" through multiple stores and different usage spaces. Additionally, students seem to enjoy this activity and are quite energetic about it.   Further, this activity is excellent for having students move beyond a deterministic rhetorical model of space.  In other words, there is more to the rhetoric of space than simple construction, other players are also important.

Synthesis Day (informal assignment for participation grade)

  • During a synthesis day I typically structure a debate between the various authors the class has read.
  • First I divide the class into teams.  Then each team is to select an author from the readings assigned.
  • Each group is to begin by diagramming the article using the rhetorical triangle.  (This should be very familiar as I typically do this at the start of many class discussions.)
  • Next, I write a set of questions on the board:
    • How does this author think or use the idea of space?
    • What is the audience asked to believe through this piece?
    • What types of arguments would this author use to redesign this classroom (or building, or campus, etc.)?
  • I give each group approximately 15 minutes to think about these questions.  Then they must present a brief speech on what the author would suggest about changing the environment of the classroom based on his or her article. (This activity might be more or less difficult depending on the authors used, but with some prodding, most groups proceed easily)
  • Next, the other groups must counter the ideas of the others by proving their solution as the best.
  • Finally, we vote on which solution seems the best.
  • Note: While you may never achieve a plurality in the final vote, this is good for bringing students back to the authors we have read, as well has making sure they have the rhetorical dimensions of these articles "hammered out." Additionally, this activity is great for introducing variant opinions about spaces that will lead into a controversy.   Finally, this activity is great for having students engage with what "space" might mean throughout these readings.

Building Fieldtrip (2 day assignment; informal participation grade)

  • For this field trip I invite students to meet for class at a building on campus.  This might be the Museum of Natural History, the Art Museum, the library, the Jefferson Building, Old Capitol, etc. 
  • Tour guides will lead students through the building.  If no tour guides are available, I will lead students through the space.
  • On the second day of this assignment I have students complete a 15-20 minute in-class writing response to the building.  Next, we discuss the rhetorical elements of this space including arrangement, placement on campus, size, posturing, etc.
  • Students are not too fond of wandering through buildings. Yet, if you give them "insider" information, they tend to be more excited.  Also, I think that they are able to perform a rhetorical analysis better once they've physically visited a space.

Deconstructing an Online Museum and/or Website (informal assignment for participation grade)

  • During this exercise I take the students through an online tour of either a museum website or another website.   I recommend the MUVA El Pais museum website or the Smithsonian Institution website.  However, many websites would work including Nike, FBI website, etc. 
  • The second day of this informal assignment I quickly go through the website again.  Then, I have students write for 15-20 minutes informally about the rhetorical impact of the website.  Afterward, we discuss the rhetorical tools employed and how the class might analyze the website.  We also discuss how rhetorical terms may or may not be ill-equipped to deal with websites.
  • I collect the writings and grade them as part of the assignment.
  • Note: Students usually do really well with this activity.  They think of elements to analyze that I would never dream of.  Often, they will bring in examples of other websites after this exercise is over.

top of page